Free shipping from €100
NUROLABS

Materials & Sustainability

Microplastics and Textiles: Is rPET Really the Better Choice?

An honest answer, even if it's uncomfortable: a study cited by VerbraucherService Bayern found that recycled polyester can shed on average around 55% MORE microplastic particles when washed than newly produced polyester. rPET solves the crude-oil and waste problem – not automatically the microplastic problem.

Why we're showing this uncomfortable finding anyway

As a seller of rPET cleaning cloths, we could take the easy route and only mention rPET's advantages. But honest information means also showing facts that don't flatter our own product: a more recent study cited by VerbraucherService Bayern found that recycled polyester can shed around 55% more microplastic particles when washed than virgin polyester.

How this effect might occur

One possible explanation: rPET fibres tend to be shorter and somewhat structurally weaker due to the recycling process (see What is recycled PET?), which can promote fibre shedding during washing.

What this means for the overall environmental picture

rPET solves a real problem (plastic waste, crude oil consumption for virgin material), but not automatically the microplastic problem – that affects synthetic fibres in general, whether virgin or recycled. Natural fibres like cotton also shed microfibres when washed, according to several sources cited here, though these break down biologically much faster than synthetic fibres.

What actually helps, regardless of fibre type

A special wash bag for synthetic textiles can, according to several sources cited here, capture most of the fibre shedding before it reaches the wastewater. For a cleaning cloth that isn't washed in a machine but by hand (see How to clean a microfibre cloth correctly), this specific risk is already significantly lower than for regularly machine-washed clothing.

Author: Moritz Weinert, Gründer NURO Labs · Last updated on 8 September 2026